| Manufacturer | Standard Motor Company |
|---|---|
| Production | 1947–1956 |
| Successor | Standard Triumph inline-six |
| Displacement | 1,850 cc (later 2,088 cc) |
| Cylinder bore | 80 mm (later 85 mm) |
| Piston stroke | 92 mm |
| Cylinder block alloy | cast iron, wet liners |
| Cylinder head alloy | cast iron |
| Valvetrain | OHV |
| Fuel system | carburettor |
| Fuel type | petrol (gasoline), TVO, lamp oil (variant engines, not multifuel) |
| Cooling system | water-cooled |
| Power output |
23.9 bhp (Ferguson TE-A20 tractor) 68 bhp (Standard Vanguard) |
The Standard Motor Company 2,088 cc straight-4 engine was a petrol engine widely used for their passenger cars of the 1950s, most notably the Standard Vanguard. It was originally developed as an engine for Ferguson tractors.
The engine was of conventional design as a water-cooled vertical straight-4 with overhead valves. As such it represented typical "modern" practice for an engine designed in the immediate post-war period, incorporating such modern features as thin-wall bearings with replaceable shells. An uncommon, and particularly forward-looking, feature was the use of loose-fitted wet liners.
Contents |
The engine's origins began with wartime production of Bristol aero engines at the new Banner Lane shadow factory, operated by Standard in Coventry.[1] From 1939 this factory produced Bristol Hercules engines, an air-cooled radial engine, with Bristol's typical sleeve valves. With peace in 1945, this huge factory then stood empty.
During the war, Ford had built tractors for Ferguson in Detroit. Afterwards, Ferguson wished to continue this arrangement with an improved TO20 tractor (for "Tractor Overseas") and also a TE20 (for "Tractor England") to be built by Ford's plant at Dagenham. Ford however were unwilling and it was Standard who were to build the tractors at Banner Lane.[2] The first TE20 model used a Continental Z-120 petrol engine,[3] but the TE-A20 and later models were to use a new engine, to be developed by Standard.[4]
The new tractor engine appeared in 1947.[3] It was a four-cylinder engine with a bore of 80 mm and stroke of 92 mm, for a total capacity of 1,850 cc.[4] The engine was undersquare, in deference to the tractor's need for torque rather than absolute power. It used petrol as a fuel, with a compression ratio of 5.77:1. Valvegear was conventional overhead valve, driven from a camshaft mounted in the side of the cylinder block via vertical pushrods and adjustable rockers. Cylinder block and crankcase were cast in one piece and were of cast iron, as was the cylinder head.
Construction of the engine would be regarded as typical for the 1950s, although this engine was developed in the late 1940s and its lineal derivatives, the Triumph straight-six and straight-four engines, would remain in production into the 1970s. In some aspects it was advanced for its day, particularly in its use of components such as pistons being pre-graded into standardised sizes and marked as such. This avoided the need for costly hand-fitting during assembly and also simplified replacement in service. It was one of the first mass-production engines to use thin-wall bearings: a steel shell faced with whitemetal bearing material. Rather than re-metalling the bearing journals and hand-scraping a new bearing surface to fit the crankshaft, these bearings were disposable after use. Several replacement bearing shells were expected to be fitted before the crankshaft required re-grinding. Had the tractor been built at Ford, Dagenham as originally intended, it is likely that the engine would still have been designed around the whitemetal bearings that Ford continued with on small car engines throughout the 1950s.
The distinctive, and unusual, feature of the engine was its use of wet liners to form the cylinders. Rather than the cylinders being bored into the cast-iron block, separate thin-walled steel tubes were inserted into a hollow block. The space between liner and block formed a large uninterrupted water jacket, which improved cooling, as did the thin tubes of the liners. The liners only loosely installed into the block with hand pressure. They sealed into the block at the bottom by a pair of soft metal "spectacle washers"[4] that each sealed a pair of liners. Each liner stood slightly proud of the cylinder block face.[5] so that it formed a good seal against the head gasket when assembled. Such wet liners had been used in high performance engines for many years, but this was an early use of them for a low-cost, mass-production engine. Particularly with the advanced grinding techniques necessary to make such a thin-walled tube with good concentricity and surface finish, other manufacturers saw them as over-complex. However Banner Lane's building of sleeve-valve Bristol engines during the war had given them the necessary experience and equipment. Throughout the engine's service it was seen as a dependable and reliable, if slightly staid and tractor-like, engine and these liners never gave the trouble that gave other engines such as the much later Rover K-series such a poor reputation.
Another distinctive, although less revolutionary, feature of the engine was the location of the tubes carrying the valve pushrods. Rather than being cast inside the cylinder head, thus requiring more cores and complexity, they were outside the main casting of the head. The top and bottom faces of the head were extended to form a flange on the camshaft side of the engine and individual steel tubes were placed through the flanges to enclose each pushrod (a similar system was used for the Volkswagen Beetle engine, albeit with longer tubes the entire length of the cylinder). These tubes were expanded at top and bottom to seal them and thus became a permanent part of the cylinder head. The separate tubes were reliable, less expensive to manufacture than casting them into the head, and gave that side of the engine its distinctive "hollow" appearance with the rocker box appearing to be supported by columns.
Farms up until then had little machinery, electricity was still uncommon, and the tractor was expected to also be able to power farm machinery. For this purpose, the tractor was equipped with a power take-off shaft at the rear. This could drive either a hitched implement such as a rotovator, or static machinery such as a thresher. The engine was fitted with a governor to allow the engine speed to be set somewhere between idling speed of 400 rpm and full power speed of 2,200 rpm, maintaining this speed against varying loads. The "belt hp" rating of the tractor was 23.9 hp although the tax rating of 20 hp gave the tractor its model number of TE20.
The first tractor models of 1947 were built for petrol fuel. In 1949 versions of the engine using TVO, and in 1950 lamp oil were introduced.[3][4] TVO has a low octane rating of around 60 and so the engine had the usual changes to compression ratio and ignition timing. A heat shield around the manifolds increased the inlet temperature, encouraging vapourisation of the fuel. To avoid problems with fuel condensation in the inlet ports, diameter of the valves (in some engine versions) was also reduced, thus increasing flow velocity.[4] The lamp oil engine used a zero octane paraffin (kerosene) fuel, but was only suitable for use in warm climates, or else the fuel did not vapourise adequately.
In 1951 Standard produced their first diesel engine for the TE-F20 tractor.[6] This was a new engine design, different from the petrol engine. Bore of 3 3/16" and stroke of 4" gave a capacity of 2,092 cc. In 1954 this engine also found its way into the Phase II Vanguard, making this Britain's first production diesel car.
A larger capacity of 2,088 cc was achieved by changing the pistons and liners for a bore of 85 mm, whilst retaining the stroke of 92 mm.[7] These are generally known as "85 mm engines", in contrast to the original "80 mm".
This used the same 2,088 cc "85 mm" engine that had been developed for the tractor. Compression ration remained the same at 6:1 but the valve and ignition timing were changed to suit road driving conditions and a more predictable quality of petrol.[8] The governor was removed and the overall performance rose to an impressive, for its day, output of 68 bhp.[9]